Who Refers You

Who refers you for CAR-T therapy in India?

No one applies for CAR-T on their own. In India the referral is made by your treating haematologist or medical oncologist, almost always after a relapse or after a line of treatment has failed. They send your clinical file to an accredited cell-therapy centre. That centre repeats its own eligibility testing and decides whether to accept the case.

Families often look for an application form, a queue to join, or a hospital desk that takes requests. None of those exist for cell therapy in India. The pathway runs doctor to doctor, and the paperwork travels ahead of the patient. Knowing who holds which decision is what saves weeks.

Who is involved What they decide What they cannot do
Your treating haemato-oncologistWhether CAR-T is worth raising at all, and at what point in the diseaseCannot admit you to a cell-therapy programme or hold a slot
The cell-therapy centre’s teamWhether the file is accepted, which product applies, and when a slot opensCannot proceed before its own eligibility testing is complete
The centre’s cell-therapy or tumour boardThe recorded clinical decision, and the written estimate that follows itCannot treat outside the product’s approved Indian indication
The manufacturer’s coordination teamApheresis scheduling, cold-chain logistics and manufacturing timelinesCannot decide clinical eligibility for any patient
You and your familyWhich centre to approach, whether to proceed, and consent at every stageCannot self-refer, and cannot buy the product directly

Where CION sits in this pathway

CION Cancer Clinics does not provide, administer or stock CAR-T or any other cell therapy. The immunotherapy delivered at CION centres is checkpoint-inhibitor and antibody-based day-care treatment, which is a different class of medicine altogether. Our role in the CAR-T pathway is orientation and referral: helping a family work out whether the diagnosis is even in the right category, what a cell-therapy centre will ask for, and what the realistic sequence looks like. Nothing on this page is an offer of a product, a price for one, or a recommendation to use one.

That distinction matters as soon as you start making calls. A hospital that describes itself as a CAR-T partner may hold a referral and billing arrangement rather than a treatment licence. The list of centres that actually collect the cells, give the infusion and hold intensive care in the same building is short, and it is set out in Where Is CAR-T Therapy Available in India?

The Paperwork

What reports are needed to apply for CAR-T?

A centre will not review a case from a summary letter. It needs the histopathology report, flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry documenting CD19, recent imaging, bone-marrow studies, the full sequence of previous treatments with dates, and current blood and organ-function results. Missing CD19 documentation is the commonest reason a file goes back.

Assemble the set once, in one dated folder, and send it complete. Every incomplete file costs a round trip, and a round trip in this pathway is rarely less than a week.

Report the centre asks for Why it is needed Why files get sent back
Histopathology or diagnosis reportConfirms the exact B-cell subtype, not simply “lymphoma”Subtype not stated, so it cannot be matched to an approved indication
Flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry showing CD19Both Indian products are CD19-directed, so without CD19 there is no targetCD19 assumed from the diagnosis rather than documented on a report
Bone-marrow aspiration and biopsyShows marrow involvement and current disease burdenReport predates the most recent line of treatment
Recent PET-CT or CT imagingEstablishes measurable disease as it stands todayScan too old to describe the disease the centre would be treating
Complete treatment history with datesBoth Indian approvals sit after at least one prior line has failedDrugs listed without dates, cycles, or the response to each
Blood counts, liver and kidney function, cardiac echocardiogramThe published eligibility criteria set thresholds for each of theseResults older than the last treatment cycle
Infection screening for HIV, hepatitis B and C, and CMVActive infection has to be cleared before intensive treatmentScreening not yet done, adding about a week to the process
Recorded ECOG performance statusDetermines fitness for lymphodepletion and for the infusion itselfNever written down, so the centre has to ask for it separately

Compiled from ImmunoACT’s published prescribing and eligibility information for healthcare professionals and from CDSCO new-drug approval listings, checked August 2026. The published NexCAR19 criteria include an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2, an ejection fraction of at least 45 per cent on echocardiography, adequate liver and kidney function, negative viral screening, and no active central nervous system disease. Individual centres routinely ask for more.

Two habits help more than anything else here. Send the slides and the imaging discs, not only the typed reports, because centres frequently want their own pathologist to look. And keep one dated master set as a single PDF, so it can be forwarded to a second centre without being rebuilt from scratch.

The Timeline

How long does each stage of the CAR-T process take?

Most of the wait is administrative rather than laboratory time. Referral and record review take days to about two weeks. Eligibility testing at the centre takes roughly a week. Slot allocation and financial clearance are the most variable stage. ImmunoACT describes manufacturing turnaround for NexCAR19 as around eighteen days.

The table below sets the stages out in the order they happen, with what typically stretches each one. It is a shape, not a promise. The only timeline that applies to you is the one quoted by the centre holding your file.

Stage Typically takes What stretches it
Your oncologist raises CAR-T and writes the referralThe same visit, up to a few daysWaiting on a repeat scan or marrow study before the letter can be written
Records reach the centre and are reviewedDays to about 2 weeksAn incomplete file, above all CD19 status that was never documented
Eligibility testing at the centreAbout 1 weekActive infection, borderline organ function, or CNS disease to be cleared first
Cell-therapy or tumour board decisionDaysBoards meet on a fixed weekly schedule, so a file can miss one by a day
Slot allocation and financial clearanceDays to several weeks, the most variable stageFinite apheresis slots, and insurance or scheme approval still pending
Leukapheresis sessionAbout 4 to 6 hours, as day careA low lymphocyte count soon after chemotherapy, which can force a repeat attempt
Manufacturing at the laboratoryAround 18 days for NexCAR19, per the manufacturerA batch that does not meet release testing and has to be repeated
Bridging treatment while waitingAs requiredDisease that is moving quickly and needs control before infusion
Lymphodepleting chemotherapy, then infusionA few days, then a single infusion of about 30 minutesBlood counts or infection delaying the conditioning schedule
Inpatient monitoring after infusionMedian of roughly 8 to 12 days in Indian real-world reportingCytokine release syndrome or neurological toxicity needing intensive care

Stage timings from ImmunoACT’s published information for healthcare professionals and from hospitals’ own descriptions of their pathways, checked August 2026. The reported median hospitalisation after infusion comes from the manufacturer’s published Indian real-world series and describes length of stay, not outcome.

Two things follow from that table. The clock that matters most runs before leukapheresis, and it is the part nobody can compress with money. And disease that is moving quickly does not wait politely for a slot, which is why bridging treatment is planned rather than improvised, and why a delayed referral costs more than a delayed batch.

Who this referral pathway is not for

Most people who read a CAR-T referral guide will never reach the referral, and saying that early is more useful than a hopeful process map. The pathway above only opens once a haematologist has established that the diagnosis sits inside a narrow group. CAR-T is generally not used, or is used only after careful specialist assessment, in these situations:

  • Any cancer that is not a CD19-positive B-cell blood cancer. The two Indian approvals cover B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Solid tumours such as breast, lung, colon, head and neck or prostate cancer fall outside them entirely.
  • Myeloma and T-cell lymphomas. These need a different target altogether, because CD19 is not present on those cells for a CD19-directed product to bind to.
  • Patients who have not yet had a prior line of treatment. Both Indian approvals sit after at least one earlier line has failed. CAR-T is not a first-line option.
  • Patients below the age on the label. NexCAR19 is approved from 15 years and Qartemi for adults from 18, so the same person can be eligible for one product and not the other.
  • Anyone whose organ function, performance status or active infection rules out intensive treatment. Eligibility testing exists precisely to find this out, and it is a clinical judgement rather than a formality.
  • Patients with active central nervous system disease at the time of treatment. This normally has to be controlled before a centre will proceed.
  • Anyone hoping to shorten the pathway by paying more. Apheresis slots and manufacturing capacity are physical limits. Money can move the financial-clearance stage; it does not move the laboratory.

Eligibility is decided only by a haematologist or cell-therapy team working from your own reports, marrow studies, scans and treatment history, never from a web page. Being turned down by one centre is a clinical judgement about the disease, not a queue you can jump by trying another city.

The Process Map

What are the steps from first contact to infusion?

Nine steps separate a first conversation from an infusion. Your oncologist raises CAR-T, assembles the file and refers. The centre reviews it, tests eligibility and takes the case to a board. A slot and financial clearance follow, then leukapheresis, manufacturing, conditioning chemotherapy, infusion and inpatient monitoring.

  1. Your haemato-oncologist raises CAR-T as an option. This normally happens after a relapse, or after a line of treatment has failed, not at diagnosis.
  2. The file is assembled. Diagnosis report, CD19 documentation, marrow studies, recent imaging, and the treatment history with dates and responses.
  3. The referral goes to an accredited cell-therapy centre. Choose on the product, the diagnosis and the age on the label, not on the hospital brand.
  4. The centre reviews the file. It is deciding whether the case even falls inside an approved Indian indication before it spends testing capacity on it.
  5. The centre repeats its own eligibility testing. Organ function, cardiac assessment, infection screening, performance status, and confirmation that there is no active central nervous system disease.
  6. The case goes to a cell-therapy or tumour board. Ask for the decision and a written, itemised estimate to come out of this step rather than a verbal figure.
  7. A slot is allocated and financial clearance is arranged. This is usually where the real waiting happens, because apheresis slots and manufacturing capacity are finite.
  8. Leukapheresis, then manufacturing. Cells are collected in a day-care session, moved under cold chain, and prepared over roughly eighteen days for NexCAR19. Bridging treatment may run alongside.
  9. Conditioning chemotherapy, infusion and monitoring. Lymphodepletion over a few days, one infusion of about thirty minutes, then admitted monitoring for cytokine release syndrome and neurological toxicity.

A referral being made is not the same as a referral being accepted, and a slot being mentioned is not the same as a slot being held. Have steps four, six and seven confirmed in writing before anyone travels or pays.

Which Product

Which Indian CAR-T product would the referral be for?

Two CD19-directed products hold Indian market authorisation, and they do not cover the same patients. NexCAR19, from ImmunoACT, was approved by the Indian regulator in 2023 from age 15. Qartemi, from Immuneel Therapeutics, was approved and launched in January 2025 for adults with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

This matters at referral, not later. The same patient can sit inside one label and outside the other, and the centre you are referred to may administer only one of them.

  NexCAR19 (talicabtagene autoleucel) Qartemi (varnimcabtagene autoleucel)
Developer and siteImmunoACT, Navi Mumbai; developed with IIT Bombay and Tata Memorial HospitalImmuneel Therapeutics, manufactured at its Bengaluru facility
Indian regulatory statusApproved by the Indian regulator in 2023Approved and launched in January 2025
Approved indicationRelapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemiaAdult relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; approval for B-cell ALL is described by BIRAC as still in progress
Minimum age on the Indian label15 years and above18 years and above
Prior treatment requiredAt least one prior line of systemic therapyAt least one prior line of systemic therapy
Manufacturing turnaroundDescribed by the manufacturer as around 18 daysConfirm with the treating centre; manufactured in Bengaluru
What this means for a referralThe wider of the two Indian labels, taking adolescents from 15 and B-cell ALLAdults with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Approval status and label details checked in August 2026 against CDSCO listings, the manufacturers’ own published information for healthcare professionals, and the BIRAC product listing for varnimcabtagene autoleucel. Regulatory status in this field changes; confirm the current label with the treating centre before any decision is taken.

If the referral is being pointed at the newer product, Qartemi: India’s Second Approved CAR-T Therapy covers what it is and who it is approved for. Where a family is weighing the two, NexCAR19 vs Qartemi: How the Two Indian CAR-T Products Compare sets the labels side by side, and the NexCAR19 eligibility criteria are worked through in detail on their own page.

If The Answer Is No

What happens if the referral is declined, and what does the process cost?

Centres decline cases, and they decline for clinical reasons: the disease is not CD19-positive, it sits outside the approved indication, organ function will not tolerate lymphodepletion, an infection is active, or central nervous system disease is uncontrolled. Ask for the reason in writing. Asking another centre to review the file is legitimate, but the same reports travel with it.

Where the barrier is age or indication rather than fitness, a different Indian product, an informational look at open clinical trials, or a different line of treatment may be worth discussing with your own oncologist. Where the barrier is fitness, the useful conversation is about what would have to change for the answer to change, and whether that is realistic in the time the disease allows.

What the process costs before treatment even starts

Published reporting in August 2026 put the price of NexCAR19 in India at under ₹30 lakh, described in that coverage as a fraction of CAR-T prices in Western countries, and Qartemi’s launch coverage in January 2025 described it as priced well below global CAR-T. These figures are indicative, as of August 2026, and come from published sources rather than from any rate card of ours.

The product price is never the whole bill. Eligibility testing, repeat imaging, leukapheresis, bridging treatment, lymphodepleting chemotherapy, the admission itself, intensive care if it is needed, supportive medicines such as tocilizumab, and travel and accommodation near the centre are all billed separately. Two centres quoting the same product price can still produce very different final bills, which is why a written, itemised estimate matters more than a headline number. What insurers and schemes have actually settled is set out in Insurance and Scheme Coverage for CAR-T by Product, and the public-sector route in Getting CAR-T at a Government Hospital.

Where CION stands on CAR-T. CION Cancer Clinics does not provide, administer or stock CAR-T or any other cell therapy, and no centre, product or manufacturer named on this page has any commercial relationship with us. Nothing here is an offer of a product, a price for one, or a recommendation to use one. This page is referral and orientation information for families trying to understand a process that is poorly explained elsewhere.
Common questions

Applying for CAR-T in India: Frequently Asked Questions

How do I apply for CAR-T therapy in India?

There is no application form and no self-referral route. Your treating haematologist or medical oncologist starts the process by writing a referral and sending your clinical file to an accredited cell-therapy centre. The file has to include the histopathology report, flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry confirming CD19, recent imaging, bone-marrow studies and the complete treatment history with dates. The centre reviews the file, repeats its own eligibility testing, discusses the case at a cell-therapy or tumour board, and only then offers a slot with a written estimate. A referral being made is not the same as a referral being accepted.

What reports does a CAR-T centre need before it will consider a case?

At a minimum the centre needs the histopathology or diagnosis report naming the exact B-cell subtype, flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry documenting CD19 positivity, bone-marrow aspiration and biopsy, recent PET-CT or CT imaging, and the full sequence of previous treatments with dates, cycles and response. Current blood counts, liver and kidney function, a cardiac echocardiogram, infection screening for HIV, hepatitis B and C and CMV, and a recorded ECOG performance status are also expected, because the published eligibility criteria set thresholds for each. Files are most often sent back because CD19 status was assumed from the diagnosis rather than documented on a report.

How long does the whole CAR-T process take, from referral to infusion?

There is no single figure, and most of the wait is administrative rather than laboratory time. Referral and record review usually take days to about two weeks. Eligibility testing at the centre takes roughly a week. Slot allocation and financial clearance are the most variable stage and can run from days to several weeks, because apheresis slots and manufacturing capacity are finite. Leukapheresis itself is a day-care session of about four to six hours. ImmunoACT describes manufacturing turnaround for NexCAR19 as around eighteen days. Lymphodepleting chemotherapy is given over a few days before a single infusion of about thirty minutes, followed by inpatient monitoring.

Can I approach a CAR-T centre directly, without a referral?

You can contact a centre to ask what it treats and what it requires, and many families do. What you cannot do is enter the pathway that way. The centre will still need a treating haematologist or medical oncologist to send the clinical file, because the decision rests on documented diagnosis, CD19 status, prior lines of treatment and organ function rather than on a request. Arriving with an incomplete file usually costs time rather than saving it. The faster route is to ask your own oncologist to assemble the complete record set first, and then send it to a centre that administers the product your diagnosis and age actually fit.

Does CION Cancer Clinics provide CAR-T therapy?

No. CION Cancer Clinics does not provide, administer or stock CAR-T therapy or any other cell therapy, and this page is referral and orientation content only. The immunotherapy delivered at CION centres is checkpoint-inhibitor and antibody-based day-care treatment, which is a different class of medicine altogether. Families searching for how to apply for CAR-T in India find very little plain-language information about the process itself, which is why this page exists. Where a diagnosis may sit inside a CAR-T indication, the appropriate next step is a referral to an accredited cell-therapy centre made by the treating haemato-oncologist.

What happens if a CAR-T centre declines the referral?

Centres decline cases, and they usually decline for clinical reasons: the disease is not CD19-positive, it falls outside the approved Indian indication, organ function or performance status will not tolerate lymphodepletion, an infection is active, or central nervous system disease is not controlled. Ask for the reason in writing. Asking another centre to review the file is legitimate, but the same reports travel with the case, so the answer often does not change unless something clinical changes first. Where the barrier is age or indication rather than fitness, the other Indian product, an open clinical trial or a different line of treatment may be worth discussing.