NCCN-protocol care · 96.9% 1-yr breast cancer survival · ArogyaSri, CGHS & cashless insurance accepted · Free second opinion
1800 202 8726
Biomarker Testing & Eligibility

Why two labs gave you different PD-L1 results

Holding two PD-L1 reports that don't match? It happens more than patients expect — PD-L1 immunohistochemistry uses several different antibody clones (22C3, 28-8, SP263, SP142), each validated for a specific drug, and two accredited labs can report modestly different numbers on the very same tissue without either one being wrong. NCCN and ASCO both acknowledge this as a known limitation of PD-L1 testing, not a lab error. This page explains, calmly, why the numbers can differ and what to check before assuming one lab got it wrong — it explains terminology only; only your oncologist can interpret what your specific reports mean for you.

Medically reviewed by Dr. C. Raghavendra Reddy, Medical Oncologist, MBBS (Gold Medal) · DNB · DM (Medical Oncology, Gold Medal) · Last reviewed August 2026

  • Different labs, different clones — 22C3, 28-8, SP263 and SP142 aren't interchangeable, and different clones can score the same sample differently
  • Not necessarily an error — modest variation between two accredited labs is a published, recognised limitation of PD-L1 testing
  • The assay matters more than the lab — check which antibody clone each report used before deciding one lab is "right"
  • One number, not the whole picture — your oncologist weighs PD-L1 alongside MSI, TMB, subtype and stage, not in isolation
4.8 · 800+ Google reviews · 15,000+ patients treated
Limited Slots Today

Get Your Two PD-L1 Reports Reviewed — Free

₹950   Today: FREE  ·  Including free written second opinion

45-min doctor-led review
Tumour board for every patient
Confidential. No commitment to start treatment.
or
Call 1800 202 8726
17+
Cancer Specialists
on Panel
96.9%
Breast Cancer
Survival Rate*
15,000+
Patients
Treated
4.8★
Google Rating
(800+ reviews)
Start Here

Why do two labs give different PD-L1 results?

PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is not one standardised test — it's a family of related assays, each built around a specific antibody clone (22C3, 28-8, SP263 or SP142) validated as a companion diagnostic for a specific drug in a specific cancer's trial. Two accredited labs testing the very same tissue block with different clones can report a modestly different number, and factors such as sample age, tissue quality, and scoring by different pathologists add a further layer of natural variation.

This is openly discussed in NCCN and ASCO guidance as a recognised limitation of PD-L1 as a biomarker — it is why oncologists read a PD-L1 result alongside the assay it came from, rather than treating any single number as an absolute verdict. A difference between two reports is common enough that it rarely means either lab made a mistake.

PD-L1 testing for CION patients is coordinated through accredited partner pathology laboratories that perform the staining and scoring — this page explains the general terminology behind why numbers can vary; it does not interpret your specific reports.

Did you know?

Because PD-L1 assays differ by clone, a pharma-industry consortium ran the "Blueprint" PD-L1 IHC comparability studies starting in 2017, testing multiple clones side-by-side on the same tumour samples — the findings are part of why pathology labs now report the antibody clone used, not just a bare score.

Which Assay Was Used?

Common PD-L1 antibody clones — what they're validated for

Check your report's methodology line for one of these clone names. Comparing a result from one clone against another is not a like-for-like comparison.

Antibody clone Scoring method Typically used for Companion drug (example)
22C3 TPS or CPS, depending on cancer type Lung, gastric, cervical, head & neck cancers Pembrolizumab
28-8 TPS Non-small cell lung cancer Nivolumab
SP263 TPS Lung and urothelial cancers Durvalumab
SP142 IC score (immune cells), not TPS/CPS Triple-negative breast, urothelial cancers Atezolizumab

Clones, scoring methods and example companion drugs shown are the commonly cited associations from regulatory companion-diagnostic labelling and NCCN/ASCO guideline references, indicative as of August 2026. Guidelines are updated periodically — your oncologist confirms which assay applies to your specific treatment plan; this table is general education, not an eligibility statement.

Holding two different PD-L1 reports?

Bring both to a free, doctor-led review to understand what caused the difference and what it means for your options.

or
Call 1800 202 8726
12+ Centres in Hyderabad · Pick yours

CION cancer care is closer than you think.

We're never more than 30 minutes away. Same panel of specialists at every centre. Same tumour board reviews. Same NCCN protocols. Pick the closest one and call directly — or let us pick for you.

Not sure which centre fits best? Tell us where you are — we'll suggest the closest one with the right specialists.

Help me pick the right centre
Meet the Specialists

17+ senior cancer specialists. One panel for your case.

Trained at AIIMS, Tata Memorial, and leading international centres. Combined 150+ years of experience. Every complex case is reviewed by 3+ of them — together.

Dr. Naresh Gundu
Medical Oncologist

Dr. Naresh Gundu

MBBS, DNB (Internal Medicine), DM (Medical Oncology)

View Profile
Dr. C. Raghavendra Reddy
Medical Oncologist

Dr. C. Raghavendra Reddy

MBBS(Gold Medal), DNB(General Medicine), DM(Medical Oncology)(Gold Medal)

View Profile
Dr. Bharati Devi Gorantla
Medical Oncologist

Dr. Bharati Devi Gorantla

MBBS, MD(General Medicine), DM(Medical Oncology)(Adyar,Chennai), ECMO, MRCP SCE(UK)

View Profile
Dr. Owais Mohammed
Medical Oncologist

Dr. Owais Mohammed

MBBS, MD (General Medicine), DrNB (Medical Oncology), ECMO, MRCP SCE (Medical Oncology) (UK)

View Profile
Dr. T. Raghavender Reddy
Medical Oncologist

Dr. T. Raghavender Reddy

MBBS, DM (Medical Oncology), MD (Radiation Oncology)

View Profile
Dr. N. Kiranmayee
Medical Oncologist

Dr. N. Kiranmayee

MBBS, DM (Medical Oncology), MD (Internal Medicine)

View Profile
Dr. Muralidhar Muddusetty
Surgical Oncologist

Dr. Muralidhar Muddusetty

MBBS (AIIMS), MS (Surgery) (AIIMS), DNB (Surgical Oncology), MRCS (Edinburgh)

View Profile
Dr. Raghavendra Naik
Surgical Oncologist

Dr. Raghavendra Naik

MBBS, MS (General Surgery), M.Ch (Surgical Oncology)

View Profile
Dr. Mohammed  Imaduddin
Surgical Oncologist

Dr. Mohammed Imaduddin

M.B.B.S, MS (General Surgery), M.Ch (Surgical Oncology)

View Profile
Dr. Vinay Mamidala
Surgical Oncologist

Dr. Vinay Mamidala

MBBS, MS(General Surgery), M.Ch(Surgical Oncology), FMAS, FARIS(Ongoing)

View Profile
Dr. Paila Gowri Naidu
Surgical Oncologist

Dr. Paila Gowri Naidu

MBBS, MS (General Surgery), M.Ch (Surgical Oncology), FMAS

View Profile
Dr. Venkata Sushma P
Radiation Oncologist

Dr. Venkata Sushma P

MBBS, MD (Radiation Oncology)

View Profile
Dr. Kirti Ranjan Mohanty
Radiation Oncologist

Dr. Kirti Ranjan Mohanty

MBBS, MD (Radiation Oncology)

View Profile
Dr. Gangadhar Vajrala
Radiation Oncologist

Dr. Gangadhar Vajrala

MBBS, MD (Radiation Oncology), MPH

View Profile
Dr. Basudev Pokhrel
Hematologist

Dr. Basudev Pokhrel

MBBS, M.D (Immunohematology & Blood Transfusion)

View Profile
Dr. Mohammed Imran
Interventional Radiologist

Dr. Mohammed Imran

View Profile
Dr. Vajja Sandeep Kumar
Surgical Oncologist

Dr. Vajja Sandeep Kumar

MBBS, MS (General Surgery), DrNB (Surgical Oncology), FALS Oncology

View Profile
Dr. Sridhar Kamani
Surgical Oncologist

Dr. Sridhar Kamani

MBBS, MS (General Surgery), DrNB (Surgical Oncology)

View Profile

Want a specific doctor for your case? Mention them when booking.

Book Free Consultation

Don't let conflicting numbers cause panic

Bring both reports to a free, confidential consultation. A CION oncologist will explain the likely reason for the difference and what it means for your options.

Book Free Consultation Call 1800 202 8726
What To Do Next

How do you work out which result to weigh more?

Rather than picking a "winner" between two reports, work through these checks with your oncology team.

  1. Check the antibody clone on each report

    Find the clone name (22C3, 28-8, SP263, SP142) and scoring method (TPS, CPS, IC) in the methodology line of each report — a TPS number from one clone isn't directly comparable to a CPS number from another.

  2. Confirm whether the samples are the same

    Two reports from the same biopsy block should be more directly comparable than reports from different biopsy sites, or from the primary tumour versus a metastasis.

  3. Note the time gap between samples

    PD-L1 expression can genuinely change over months or after treatment — a difference across two timepoints may reflect real biological change, not disagreement between labs.

  4. Bring both reports to your oncology team

    A tumour board weighs both results together, alongside your cancer subtype and other biomarkers, rather than averaging or discarding either number on its own.

Confused by two conflicting reports?

Share both with a CION specialist for a free written second opinion on what they mean for your options.

or
Call 1800 202 8726
The Real Answer

So which result should be trusted?

Neither report is automatically the "correct" one. Your oncology team weighs which assay is validated as the companion diagnostic for the specific drug being considered, how recent and how good the tissue quality of each sample was, and whether the two samples came from the same site and timepoint at all. In most cases both reports are read together rather than one being discarded.

Picking the higher or the lower of two numbers yourself, or shopping for a third lab to "settle" the question, usually adds cost and delay without changing the underlying clinical picture — the more useful step is almost always a conversation with your treating oncologist, with both reports in hand.

Beyond The Assay

What else can cause two different PD-L1 numbers?

The antibody clone is the biggest driver, but it isn't the only reason two PD-L1 results can differ.

  • Different antibody clone — 22C3, 28-8, SP263 and SP142 are validated for different drugs and are not interchangeable, even on the same tissue.
  • Tumour heterogeneity — PD-L1 expression can genuinely vary between different areas of the same tumour, or between the primary tumour and a metastasis.
  • Time between samples — expression can change after chemotherapy or radiation, or simply between diagnosis and a later relapse.
  • Sample age and quality — smaller biopsies or tissue fixed and stored for longer can stain less reliably than a fresh, adequate sample.
  • Scoring variability — PD-L1 scoring is done by a trained pathologist under a microscope, and some inter-observer variation is expected even with the same clone.
Related Reading

Understanding the wider biomarker picture

This page explains general reasons PD-L1 results can differ between labs, for education only, and does not interpret any individual patient's report. PD-L1 testing is coordinated at accredited partner pathology laboratories. Bring both reports to a consultation for a doctor's assessment of what they mean for you.

You're not alone

Thousands of families have decoded conflicting reports with us

Two reports that don't agree can feel like the ground shifting under a treatment decision. Our oncologists take the time to explain, in plain language, why the numbers differ and what they mean for your options.

Book Free Consultation Call 1800 202 8726
Real Stories. Real Voices.

15,000+ patients chose CION. Hear from them directly.

These aren't paid endorsements or written reviews. These are video testimonials from real patients and families — recorded on their own phones, in their own words. Pick any one. Watch it. Then decide.

4.8★800+ Google reviews
50+video testimonials
15,000+patients treated

Successful Chemotherapy Done by Dr. C Raghavendra Reddy

Watch video →

Surgery, Chemo & Radiation Done by Dr. Imaduddin, Dr. Vinay, Dr. Owais, Dr. Kirti

Watch video →

Successful Radical Thymectomy Done by Dr. Mohammed Imaduddin & Dr. Vinay Mamidala

Watch video →

Successful Surgery Done by Dr. Rajender Byshetty

Watch video →

Successful Chemo & Surgery Done by Dr. Imad, Dr. Vinay, Dr. Owais & Dr. Raghavendra

Watch video →

Successful Chemo & Surgery Done by Dr. Imad, Dr. Vinay, Dr. Owais & Dr. Raghavendra

Watch video →

Successful Chemo & Radiation Done by Dr. Owais Mohammed & Dr. Kirti Ranjan Mohanty

Watch video →

Successful Breast Cancer Surgery Done by Dr. Imaduddin Mohammed & Dr. Vinay Mamidala

Watch video →

Successful Chemotherapy Done by Dr. Bharati Devi Gorantla

Watch video →

Successful Chemo & Surgery Done by Dr. Owais Mohammed & Dr. Imaduddin Mohammed

Watch video →

Successful Chemotherapy Done by Dr. Gundu Naresh

Watch video →

Successful Bone Marrow Transplantation - Neuroblastoma

Watch video →

Successful Surgery & Chemo - Carcinoma of Caecum

Watch video →

Successful Oral chemotherapy & mastectomy surgery

Watch video →

Successful Oral chemotherapy & mastectomy surgery

Watch video →

Successful Chemotherapy

Watch video →

Successful Surgery by Dr. Mohammed Imaduddin

Watch video →

Successful Bone Marrow Transplantation

Watch video →

Successful Oral chemotherapy & mastectomy surgery

Watch video →

Successful Oral chemotherapy & mastectomy surgery

Watch video →

Successful Chemotherapy

Watch video →

Successful Buccal Mucosa Surgery

Watch video →

Successful Complex Surgery Mandibulectomy Reconstruction

Watch video →
Common questions

Different PD-L1 results from two labs: your questions answered

Why do two labs give different PD-L1 results for the same sample?
Two accredited labs can report modestly different PD-L1 numbers because PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is not one single standardised test — it is a family of related assays, each built on a specific antibody clone (such as 22C3, 28-8, SP263 or SP142) validated for a specific drug. Different clones can stain slightly differently on the very same tissue block, and factors such as sample age, tissue quality and scoring by different pathologists add further variation. This is a recognised, openly discussed limitation of PD-L1 testing in NCCN and ASCO guidance — not evidence that either lab made an error.
Which antibody clone or assay was used — how do I find that on my report?
Your pathology report should state the antibody clone (for example 22C3, 28-8, SP263 or SP142) and the scoring method used — TPS, CPS or IC score — usually in the methodology or comment section near the PD-L1 result. If it isn't clearly stated, ask the reporting lab or your oncologist to confirm which clone and platform were used before comparing two reports side by side, since comparing a TPS number from one clone against a CPS number from another is not a fair comparison.
Which result should I trust if two labs disagree?
Neither number is automatically right or wrong. Your oncology team looks at which assay is validated as the companion diagnostic for the specific drug being considered, how recent and how good the quality of each tissue sample was, and whether the two samples even came from the same site or same time point. In most cases the treating oncologist weighs both reports together rather than picking the higher or the lower figure — this is a clinical judgement call, not something this page can make for you.
Does a lower repeat PD-L1 result mean my cancer is getting worse?
Not necessarily. PD-L1 expression can genuinely change over time — after chemotherapy, radiation, or simply between diagnosis and a later relapse — and it can also differ between the primary tumour and a metastasis, or even between two areas of the same tumour. A lower number on a repeat test is often explained by this natural variability or by a different assay being used, rather than by the cancer itself worsening. Discuss any repeat result with your oncologist in the context of your overall clinical picture, not the PD-L1 number alone.
Should I get a third lab to break the tie?
Usually not as a first step. Repeated testing at additional labs adds cost, delay and tissue use without necessarily resolving the disagreement, since a third result can just as easily add a third number as settle the first two. The more useful step is usually to confirm which antibody clone and platform each existing report used and bring both to your treating oncologist, who can judge whether the difference is expected assay variation or whether repeat testing on fresh tissue is genuinely warranted.
Where is PD-L1 testing done for CION patients, and can CION interpret my two reports?
PD-L1 testing for CION patients is coordinated through accredited partner pathology laboratories that perform the immunohistochemistry staining and scoring — CION does not run this test in-house. This page explains, in general terms, why two labs can report different PD-L1 numbers; it does not interpret any individual patient's actual reports. Bring both reports to a free consultation and a CION oncologist will review them together and explain what they mean for your specific treatment options.
Call now Book free consultation