CION Cancer Clinics
The 2018 Delhi High Court ruling on genetic disorders and insurance | CION Cancer Clinics
In February 2018 the Delhi High Court held that a health insurer could not refuse a claim using a blanket exclusion for genetic disorders. It called the clause too broad and discriminatory. The Supreme Court later paused the ruling's wider findings while it hears an appeal, and the insurance regulator has since barred that exclusion in health policies. Here is what was decided and what it means for your family. At CION Cancer Clinics, our team helps carriers and their families plan checks, next steps and support after a genetic result.
On this page
- What did the Delhi High Court actually decide?
- What has changed since the ruling, and what has not?
- How did the case move through the courts?
- The legal words, in plain language
- What is protected now, and what is still open
- What this page cannot tell you
- Four things people think the ruling did
- Common questions about the ruling
The short answer
What did the Delhi High Court actually decide?
It decided that a health insurer could not refuse a claim using a blanket exclusion for "genetic disorders". The court called that clause too broad, unclear and discriminatory, and said it broke the right to equality in the Constitution. The judgment was given on 26 February 2018.
The case behind it
A man with a thickened heart muscle had renewed the same mediclaim policy for years, and earlier claims for his condition had been paid. At one renewal the insurer added an exclusion for genetic disorders without telling him. It then refused his claim for replacing a heart device. A trial court ruled in his favour, and the High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal.
What the court said about genes
The court said the right to health insurance is part of the right to health. It said insurers may set terms on reasonable, clear grounds, but cannot shut people out because of their genetic heritage. It asked the insurance regulator to look again at such clauses, and pointed to the need for rules to protect genetic data.
This was a heart case, not a cancer case. It is still the case people mean when they ask whether an insurer can refuse them over a gene result.Since 2018
What has changed since the ruling, and what has not?
Two things happened after the judgment. One weakened it and one carried part of it into the insurance rules.
The Supreme Court paused the wider findings
The insurer appealed. In August 2018 the Supreme Court stayed the High Court's general conclusions on genetic discrimination until further orders, and added the regulator to the case. While that stay lasts, those findings are not settled law.
The regulator barred the exclusion
In September 2019, IRDAI issued guidelines listing exclusions that no health policy may contain. Genetic diseases or disorders are on that list. Older products that did not follow the guidelines had to stop being sold from October 2020.
What insurers can still do
They can still ask about illnesses you already have. With your consent, they can permanently exclude certain existing illnesses you disclose, and a cancer already diagnosed is one of them.
A gene fault in a well person is not an illness. A diagnosed cancer is.What has not changed
India still has no dedicated law on genetic discrimination.
- Life insurance follows different rules
- Employers are not covered by the ruling
- Honest answers on the proposal form still matter
Not sure whether this applies to you?
Ask an oncologistStep by step
How did the case move through the courts?
-
A policy renewed for years
The policy had no genetic exclusion when it was first bought. Claims for the same heart condition were paid in earlier years.
-
A new clause at renewal
An exclusion for genetic disorders appeared in a later year's policy, without notice to the policyholder. His next claim was refused under it.
-
The trial court
It held that an insurer cannot slip a new exclusion into a renewal without telling the customer, and that the clause was discriminatory.
-
The Delhi High Court, February 2018
It dismissed the insurer's appeal, found the clause unconstitutional, ordered the claim paid with interest and costs, and directed the regulator to review genetic exclusions.
-
The Supreme Court, August 2018
On the insurer's appeal, it issued notice on the wider conclusions and stayed them until further orders. Ask a lawyer to check where the appeal stands today.
In the judgment
The legal words, in plain language
- Exclusion clause
- A line in the policy listing what the insurer will not pay for. It is where a genetic disorder exclusion used to sit.
- Article 14
- The right to equality in the Constitution. It forbids treating people differently without a fair and clear reason.
- Article 21
- The right to life. Courts have read it to include the right to health, and this judgment linked health insurance to it.
- Stay
- A higher court's order pausing part of a judgment while an appeal is heard. It does not reverse the judgment.
- Pre-existing disease
- An illness diagnosed or treated before you bought the policy. Insurers may apply a waiting period to it.
- IRDAI
- The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, which sets the rules every insurer must follow. Its head office is in Hyderabad.
Leave a number, we will call you
One field. No form to fill in, and no charge for the call.
Side by side
What is protected now, and what is still open
Being straight with you
What this page cannot tell you
It is not legal advice. It cannot tell you whether the wording of your own policy is allowed, or whether a refused claim can be overturned. It also cannot tell you where the Supreme Court appeal stands on the day you read this. A lawyer who handles insurance cases can check both.
Who this does not apply to
Most families who have a genetic test never face a claim dispute over it. If you already have cancer, the question an insurer asks is usually about a pre-existing disease, not about genes. That is a different problem with different rules, and the ruling does not help much there.
Who can help
A genetic counsellor can explain what your result means for your health. The insurer's grievance officer, and after that the Insurance Ombudsman, deal with a refused claim. Your oncologist can write a letter explaining your diagnosis and when it was made, which is often what a dispute turns on.
What your specific variant means is a question for the counsellor who ordered the test.Commonly believed
Four things people think the ruling did
It ruled on one clause in one health policy. Its wider findings are on hold at the Supreme Court. No Act of Parliament deals with genetic discrimination.
Proposal forms still ask about your health, and wrong answers can still lead to a refused claim. Answer every question truthfully, and ask a counsellor if you are unsure what a question covers.
It was about a heart condition. The reasoning applies to any inherited condition in principle, but no Indian court has ruled on a cancer gene result in the same way.
The regulator's exclusion guidelines cover health policies that pay hospital bills. Life insurance is assessed under different rules and can weigh your health differently.
Questions we are asked
Common questions about the ruling
Can my health insurer refuse a claim because my cancer is inherited?
A health policy should no longer carry a blanket exclusion for genetic diseases. A claim can still be questioned on other grounds, such as an illness that was not disclosed when you bought the policy. Read the refusal letter for the exact reason and clause given.
Is the Delhi High Court ruling still valid?
The Supreme Court stayed its wider findings on genetic discrimination in August 2018, until further orders, while it hears the insurer's appeal. Those findings cannot be relied on as settled law for now. A lawyer can check the current status for you.
My renewed policy still lists a genetic exclusion. What do I do?
The regulator required health products that did not follow its exclusion guidelines to stop being sold from October 2020. Write to the insurer asking why the clause is there, and keep the reply. Take it to the grievance officer if the answer is not clear.
Should I buy insurance before having a genetic test?
Many families ask this, and it is a fair question to raise with your counsellor before testing rather than after. Whatever you decide, answer every proposal form question truthfully. A policy bought on a wrong answer can fail when you need it most.
Does the ruling protect me at work?
No. It dealt with a health insurance contract. No Indian law deals specifically with employers using genetic results. Your result is confidential medical information, and your employer has no routine way to see it unless you share it.
What should I do if a claim is refused over a genetic condition?
Ask for the reason in writing. Complain to the insurer's grievance officer and keep copies of everything. If that fails, the insurer's reply must give the contact for the Insurance Ombudsman, where you can take the complaint next.
Did the court say anything about genetic testing itself?
It said an insurer cannot apply a general genetic exclusion without testing and without saying exactly which disorder is excluded. It also said India needs a proper framework for how genetic data is collected and kept confidential.
Is there a law like America's GINA in India?
No. India has no dedicated genetic non-discrimination law. Protection comes in pieces, from this ruling, the regulator's exclusion guidelines and the data protection law. Our page on an Indian equivalent of GINA explains the gaps.
Meet CION's oncologists. Bring your family history or genetic report to them.
Our medical oncologists see people with a strong family history of cancer, arrange genetic counselling and testing where it fits, and plan the checks that follow.
Dr. C. Raghavendra Reddy
MBBS(Gold Medal), DNB(General Medicine), DM(Medical Oncology)(Gold Medal)
Dr. Bharati Devi Gorantla
MBBS, MD(General Medicine), DM(Medical Oncology)(Adyar,Chennai), ECMO, MRCP SCE(UK)
Dr. Owais Mohammed
MBBS, MD (General Medicine), DrNB (Medical Oncology), ECMO, MRCP SCE (Medical Oncology) (UK)
Want a specific doctor for your case? Mention them when booking.
Book Free ConsultationBook an appointment with our specialist
Share your name and number — we'll call you back within 30 minutes to schedule your consultation.
Sources
- Delhi High Court (via Indian Kanoon) — United India Insurance Company Limited v. Jai Parkash Tayal, 26 February 2018
- Supreme Court of India (via Indian Kanoon) — The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Jay Parkash Tayal, order of 27 August 2018
- IRDAI — Guidelines on Standardization of Exclusions in Health Insurance Contracts
- IRDAI — Master Circular on Health Insurance Business, 2024
This page is general information, not a prescription. Do not change or stop any treatment based on what you read here. If anything is worrying you, contact your own treating team — or call our helpline and we will help you reach the right specialist.
Keep reading
Related pages
Talk to us
Worried a gene result could affect your insurance?
Talk to us before you test, and we will arrange a counsellor who can explain what a result may and may not mean for cover. One helpline serves every CION centre.